Squares
and Square Roots
Introduction
You
know that the area of a square = side × side (where ‘side’ means ‘the length of
a side’). Study the following table.
What
is special about the numbers 4, 9, 25, 64 and other such numbers?
Since,
4 can be expressed as 2 × 2 = 22 , 9 can be expressed as 3 × 3 = 32
, all such numbers can be expressed as the product of the number with itself.
Such
numbers like 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ... are known as square numbers.
In
general, if a natural number m can be expressed as n2 , where n is
also a natural number, then m is a square number.
Is
32 a square number?, We know that 52 = 25 and 62 = 36. If
32 is a square number, it must be the square of a natural number between 5 and
6. But there is no natural number between 5 and 6. Therefore 32 is not a square
number.
Consider
the following numbers and their squares.
From
the above table, can we enlist the square numbers between 1 and 100? Are there
any natural square numbers upto 100 left out? You will find that the rest of
the numbers are not square numbers.
The
numbers 1, 4, 9, 16 ... are square numbers. These numbers are also called perfect squares.
1.Properties
of Square Numbers:
·
Following table shows the squares of numbers from 1 to 20.
Study the square numbers in the above table. What are the ending
digits (that is, digits in the units place) of the square numbers?
All these numbers end with 0, 1, 4, 5, 6 or 9 at units place. None
of these end with 2, 3, 7 or 8 at unit’s place. Can we say that if a number
ends in 0, 1, 4, 5, 6 or 9, then it must be a square number.
·
Study the following table of some numbers and their squares and
observe the one’s place in both.
The following square numbers end with digit 1.
Write the next two square numbers which end in 1 and their
corresponding numbers. You will see that if a number has 1 or 9 in the units
place, then it’s square ends in 1.
·
Let us consider square numbers ending in 6.
We can see that when a square number ends in 6, the number whose
square it is, will have either 4 or 6 in unit’s place.
Can you find more such rules by observing the numbers and their
squares (Table 1)
·
Consider the following numbers and their squares.
If a number contains 3 zeros at the end, how many zeros will its
square have ? What do you notice about the number of zeros at the end of the
number and the number of zeros at the end of its square.
2.Some
More Interesting Patterns
1.
Adding
triangular numbers.
triangular numbers (numbers whose dot patterns can be arranged as
triangles)
If we combine two consecutive triangular numbers, we get a square
number, like
2.
Numbers
between square numbers
Let us now see if we can find some interesting pattern between two
consecutive square numbers.
Between12 (=1) and 22 (= 4) there are two
(i.e., 2 × 1) non square numbers 2, 3.
Between 22 (= 4) and 32 (= 9) there are four
(i.e., 2 × 2) non square numbers 5, 6, 7, 8.
Now, 32
= 9, 42 = 16
Therefore, 42 –
32 = 16 – 9 = 7
Between 9(32 ) and 16( 42 ) the numbers are
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 that is, six non-square numbers which is 1 less than the
difference of two squares.
We have 42 =
16 and 52 = 25
Therefore, 52 –
42 = 9
Between 16(= 42 ) and 25(= 52 ) the numbers
are 17, 18, ... , 24 that is, eight non square numbers which is 1 less than the
difference of two squares.
Consider 72 and 62 . Can you say how many
numbers are there between 62 and 72 ?
If we think of any natural number n and (n + 1), then,
(n + 1)2 – n2 = (n2
+ 2n + 1) – n2 = 2n + 1.
We find that between n2 and (n + 1)2 there
are 2n numbers which is 1 less than the difference of two squares.
Thus, in general we can say that there are 2n non perfect square
numbers between the squares of the numbers n and (n + 1). Check for n = 5, n =
6 etc., and verify.
3.
Adding
odd numbers
Consider the following
1 [one odd
number] = 1 = 12
1 + 3 [sum
of first two odd numbers] = 4 = 22
1 + 3 + 5
[sum of first three odd numbers]
= 9 = 32
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 [... ] = 16 = 42
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 + 9 [... ] = 25 = 52
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 + 9 + 11 [... ] =
36 = 62
So we can say that the sum of first n odd natural numbers is n2
Looking at it in a different way, we can say: ‘If the number is a
square number, it has to be the sum of successive odd numbers starting from 1.
Consider the number 25. Successively subtract 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, ...
from it
(i) 25 – 1 = 24 (ii) 24
– 3 = 21 (iii) 21 – 5 = 16 (iv) 16 – 7 = 9 (v) 9 – 9 = 0
This means, 25 = 1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9. Also, 25 is a perfect square.
Now consider another number 38, and again do as above.
(i) 38 – 1 = 37 (ii)
37 – 3 = 34 (iii) 34 – 5 = 29 (iv) 29 – 7 = 22 (v) 22 – 9 = 13 (vi) 13 – 11 =
2 (vii) 2 – 13 = – 11
This shows that we are not able to express 38 as the sum of
consecutive odd numbers starting with 1. Also, 38 is not a perfect square.
So we can also say that if
a natural number cannot be expressed as a sum of successive odd natural numbers
starting with 1, then it is not a perfect square.
4.
A
sum of consecutive natural numbers
Consider the following
we can express the square
of any odd number as the sum of two consecutive positive integers.
5.
Product
of two consecutive even or odd natural numbers
11 × 13 =
143 = 122 – 1
Also 11
× 13 = (12 – 1) × (12 + 1)
Therefore, 11 × 13 = (12 – 1) × (12 + 1) = 122
– 1
Similarly, 13 × 15 = (14 – 1) × (14 + 1) = 142
– 1
29
× 31 = (30 – 1) × (30 + 1) = 302 – 1
44
× 46 = (45 – 1) × (45 + 1) = 452 – 1
So in
general we can say that (a + 1) × (a – 1) = a2 – 1.
6.
Some
more patterns in square numbers
Observe the squares of numbers; 1, 11, 111 ... etc. They give a
beautiful pattern:
12 = 1
112 = 1
2 1
111 2 = 1 2
3 2 1
11112 = 1 2
3 4 3
2 1
111112 = 1 2
3 4 5
4 3 2 1
111111112 = 1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Another
interesting pattern.
72
= 49
672 = 4489
6672 = 444889
66672 = 44448889
666672 = 4444488889
6666672 = 444444888889
Example: What will
be the unit digit of the squares of the following numbers?
(i)
81 (ii) 272 (iii) 799
Solution:
(i)
81
(81)2 = 6561
unit digit of square of 81 is 1.
(ii)
272
(272)2 = 73984
unit digit of square of 272 is 4.
(iii)
799
(799)2 = 68401
unit digit of square of 799 is 1.
Example: Observe the following pattern and find the missing digits.
112 = 121
1012 = 10201
10012 = 1002001
1000012 = 1 ......... 2 ......... 1
100000012 = ...........................
Solution:
112 = 121
1012 = 10201
10012 = 1002001
1000012 = 10000200001
100000012 = 100000020000001
Example: Without adding, find the sum.
(i)
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 + 9
(ii)
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 + 17 +19
(iii)
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 23
Solution:
(i)
1 + 3 + 5 +
7 + 9
we know that the sum of first n odd natural numbers is n2
.
here, n= total number of odd no’s
so, n= 5
Therefore, n2 = 52 = 25
1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 = 25
(ii)
1
+ 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 + 17 +19
we know that the sum of first n odd natural numbers is n2
.
here, n= total number of odd no’s
so, n= 10
Therefore, n2 = 102 = 100
(iii)
1
+ 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 23
we know that the sum of first n odd natural numbers is n2
.
here, n= total number of odd no’s
so, n= 12
Therefore, n2 = 122 = 144
3.Finding
the Square of a Number
Squares
of small numbers like 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... etc. are easy to find. But can we find
the square of 23 so quickly?
The
answer is not so easy and we may need to multiply 23 by 23.
There
is a way to find this without having to multiply 23 × 23.
We
know 23 = 20 + 3
Therefore 232 = (20 + 3)2 = 20(20
+ 3) + 3(20 + 3)
= 202 + 20 × 3 + 3 × 20 + 32
= 400 + 60 + 60 + 9 = 529
Example :
Find
the square of the following numbers without actual multiplication.
(i)
39 (ii) 42
Solution:
(i)
392
= (30 + 9)2 = 30(30 + 9) + 9(30 + 9)
= 302 + 30 × 9 + 9 ×
30 + 92
= 900 + 270 + 270 +
81 = 1521
(ii)
422
= (40 + 2)2 = 40(40 + 2) + 2(40 + 2)
= 402 + 40
× 2 + 2 × 40 + 22
= 1600 + 80 + 80 + 4
= 1764
3.1
Other patterns in squares
Consider
the following pattern:
252 = 625 = (2 × 3) hundreds + 25
352 = 1225 = (3 × 4) hundreds + 25
752 = 5625 = (7 × 8) hundreds + 25
1252 = 15625 = (12 × 13) hundreds + 25
Consider a
number with unit digit 5, i.e., a5
(a5)2 =
(10a + 5)2
= 10a(10a + 5) + 5(10a + 5)
= 100a2 + 50a + 50a +
25
= 100a(a + 1) + 25
= a(a + 1) hundred + 25
3.2
Pythagorean triplets
Consider
the following
32
+ 42 = 9 + 16 = 25 = 52
The
collection of numbers 3, 4 and 5 is known as Pythagorean triplet. 6, 8, 10 is
also a Pythagorean triplet, since
62 + 82
= 36 + 64 = 100 = 102
Again,
observe that
52
+ 122 = 25 + 144 = 169 = 132 . The numbers 5, 12, 13 form
another such triplet
For
any natural number m > 1, we have (2m)2
+ (m2 – 1)2 = (m2 + 1)2 . So,
2m, m2 – 1 and m2 + 1 forms a Pythagorean triplet.
Example 1:
Write a Pythagorean triplet whose
smallest member is 8.
Solution:
We can get Pythagorean triplets by
using general form 2m, m2 – 1, m2 + 1.
Let us first take m2 – 1
= 8
So, m2
= 8 + 1 = 9
which gives m = 3
Therefore, 2m = 6 and m2 + 1 = 10
The triplet is thus 6, 8, 10. But 8
is not the smallest member of this
So, let us try 2m = 8
then m = 4
We get m2 – 1 = 16 – 1 = 15
and m2 + 1 = 16 + 1 =
17
The triplet is 8, 15, 17 with 8 as
the smallest member.
Example 2:
Find a Pythagorean triplet in which
one member is 12
Solution:
If we take m2 – 1 = 12
Then, m2 = 12 + 1 = 13
Then the value of m will not be an
integer.
So, we try to take m2 + 1 = 12. Again m2 = 11 will not give an
integer value for m.
So, let us take 2m = 12
then m = 6
Thus, m2 – 1 = 36 – 1
= 35
and m2 + 1 = 36 + 1 = 37
Therefore, the required triplet is
12, 35, 37.
Note : All
Pythagorean triplets may not be obtained using this form. For example another
triplet 5, 12, 13 also has 12 as a member.
4
Square Roots
Study
the following situations.
(a) Area of a
square is 144 cm2 . What could be the side of the square?
We know that the area of a square = side2
If we assume the length of the side to be ‘a’, then 144 = a2
To find the length of side it is necessary to find a number whose
square is 144.
(b)
What is the
length of a diagonal of a square of side 8 cm ?
Can we use Pythagoras theorem to solve this ?
Can we use Pythagoras theorem to solve this ?
We have, AB2
+ BC2 = AC2
i.e., 82 + 82 = AC2
or 64 + 64 = AC2
or 128 = AC2
Again to get AC we need to think of a number whose square is 128.
In all the above cases, we need to find a number whose square is
known. Finding the number with the known square is known as finding the square
root.
4.1
Finding square roots
The
inverse (opposite) operation of addition is subtraction and the inverse
operation of multiplication is division. Similarly, finding the square root is
the inverse operation of squaring.
We have, 12 = 1, therefore square root of
1 is 1
22 = 4,
therefore square root of 4 is 2
32 = 9,
therefore square root of 9 is 3
From
the above, you may say that there are two integral square roots of a perfect
square number. In this chapter, we shall take up only positive square root of a
natural number. Positive square root of a number is denoted by the symbol .
For
example: 4 = 2 (not
–2); 9 = 3 (not
–3) etc.
4.2
Finding square root through repeated subtraction
The
sum of the first n odd natural numbers is n 2 ? That is, every square number
can be expressed as a sum of successive odd natural numbers starting from 1.
Consider
. Then,
(i) 81 – 1 =
80 (ii) 80 – 3 = 77 (iii) 77 – 5 = 72 (iv) 72 – 7 = 65
(v) 65 – 9 =
56 (vi)
56 – 11 = 45 (vii) 45 – 13
= 32 (viii) 32 – 15 = 17
(ix) 17 – 17
= 0
From
81 we have subtracted successive odd numbers starting from 1 and obtained 0 at
9th step.
Therefore
= 9.
4.3
Finding square root through prime factorisation
Consider
the prime factorisation of the following numbers and their squares.
How
many times does 2 occur in the prime factorisation of 6? Once. How many times
does 2 occur in the prime factorisation of 36? Twice. Similarly, observe the
occurrence of 3 in 6 and 36 of 2 in 8 and 64 etc.
You will
find that each prime factor in the prime factorisation of the square of a
number, occurs twice the number of times it occurs in the prime factorisation
of the number itself. Let us use this to find the square root of a given square
number, say 324.
We know that the prime factorisation of 324
is 2 324
324 = 2 × 2
× 3 × 3 × 3 × 3 2 162
3 81
3 27
3 9
3
By pairing
the prime factors,
we get 324 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 3
× 3 = 22 × 32 × 32 = (2 × 3 × 3)2 2 256
So, = 2 ×
3 × 3 = 18 2 128
2 64
Similarly can you find the square root of
256? Prime factorisation of 256 is 2 32
256
= 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 2 16
By pairing the prime factors we get, 2 8
256
= 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 = (2 × 2 × 2 × 2)2 2 4
Therefore, = 2 ×
2 × 2 × 2 = 16 2
Is 48 a
perfect square?
We know 48 =
2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3
Since all
the factors are not in pairs so 48 is not a perfect square
Example 1: 2
6400
Find
the square root of 6400 2 3200
2 1600
Solution: 2 800
Write
6400 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 5 × 5 2 400
Therefore
= 2 ×
2 × 2 × 2 × 5 = 80 2 200
2 100
2 50
5 25
5
Example
2:
Is 90 a perfect square? 2 90
Solution: 3 45
We have 90 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 5 3 15
The
prime factors 2 and 5 do not occur in pairs. 5
Therefore, 90 is not a perfect
square.
That 90 is not a perfect square can
also be seen
from the fact that it has only one
zero.
Example 3:
Find the smallest number by which
9408 must be divided so that the quotient is a perfect square. Find the square root of the quotient.
Solution:
We have, 9408 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 7 × 7
If we divide 9408 by the factor 3,
then
9408 ÷ 3 = 3136 = 2 × 2 × 2
× 2 × 2 × 2 × 7 × 7 which is a perfect square.
Therefore, the required smallest
number is 3.
And, = 2 ×
2 × 2 × 7 = 56.
4.4
Finding square root by division method
When
the numbers are large, even the method of finding square root by prime
factorisation becomes lengthy and difficult. To overcome this problem we use
Long Division Method.
The
smallest 3-digit perfect square number is 100 which is the square of 10 and the
greatest 3-digit perfect square number is 961 which is the square of 31. The
smallest 4-digit square number is 1024 which is the square of 32 and the
greatest 4-digit number is 9801 which is the square of 99.
The use of
the number of digits in square root of a number is useful in the following
method:
·
Consider the
following steps to find the square root of 529.
Can you estimate the number of digits in the square root of this
number?
Step 1 Place a bar over every pair of digits
starting from the digit at one’s place. If the number of digits in it is odd, then the left-most
single digit too will have a bar.
Thus we have, .
2
Step 2 Find the largest
number whose square is less than or equal to the number 2
under the extreme left bar (22
< 5 < 32 ). Take this number as the divisor -4
and
the quotient with the number under the extreme left bar as the 1
dividend (here 5). Divide and get
the remainder (1 in this case).
2
Step 3 Bring down the
number under the next bar (i.e., 29 in this case) to the 2
right of the remainder. So the new
dividend is 129. -4
1 29
Step 4 Double the
quotient and enter it with a blank on its right.
Step
5 Guess a largest possible digit to fill
the blank which will also become 2
the new digit in the quotient, such
that when the new divisor is multiplied 2
to the new quotient the product is
less than or equal to the dividend. -4
In
this case , 42 × 2 = 84. 4_ 1 29
As 43 × 3 = 129 so we choose the new
digit as 3. Get the remainder.
Step
6 Since the remainder is 0 and no digits
are left in the given number, 23
therefore, = 23. 2
-4
43 1 29
-1 29
0
·
Now consider
Step 1 Place a bar over
every pair of digits starting from the one’s digit. ( ).
Step 2 Find the largest
number whose square is less than or equal to the number under the left- most bar (62 < 40 < 72
). Take this number as the divisor and the number under the left- most bar as the dividend. Divide and get the
remainder i.e., 4 in this case.
Step 3 Bring down the
number under the next bar (i.e., 96) to the right of the remainder. The new dividend is 496.
Step 4 Double the
quotient and enter it with a blank on its right.
Step 5 Guess a largest
possible digit to fill the blank which also becomes the new digit in the quotient such that when the new digit is
multiplied to the new quotient the product is less than or equal to the dividend. In this case we see that 124 × 4
= 496. So the new digit in the quotient
is 4. Get the remainder.
Step 6 Since the
remainder is 0 and no bar left, therefore,
Estimating
the number
We
use bars to find the number of digits in the square root of a perfect square
number.
= 23. And
In
both the numbers 529 and 4096 there are two bars and the number of digits in
their square root is 2. Can you tell the number of digits in the square root of
14400?
By
placing bars we get . Since there are 3 bars, the square root will
be of 3 digit.
Example :
Find
the square root of : (i) 729 (ii)
1296
Solution:
5
Square Roots of Decimals
· Consider
Step 1 To find the square root of a decimal
number we put bars on the integral part (i.e., 17) of the number in the usual manner. And place bars
on the decimal part(i.e., 64) on every pair of digits
beginning with the first decimal place. Proceed as usual. We get .
Step 2 Now proceed in a similar manner. The
left most bar is on 17 and 42 < 17 < 52 . Take this
number as the divisor and the number
under the left-most bar as the dividend, i.e., 17. Divide and get the remainder.
Step 3 The remainder is 1. Write the number
under the next bar (i.e., 64) to the right of this remainder, to get 164.
Step 4 Double the divisor and enter it with
a blank on its right. Since 64 is the decimal part so put a decimal point in the quotient.
Step 5 We know 82 × 2 = 164, therefore, the
new digit is 2. Divide and get the remainder.
Step 6 Since the remainder is 0 and no bar
left, therefore
Example : Find the
square root of 12.25.
Solution:
Example : Area of a
square plot is 2304 m2 . Find the side of the square plot.
Solution:
Area of square plot = 2304 m2
Therefore,
side of the square plot = m
We find that, = 48
Thus, the side of the square plot is
48 m.
Example : There are 2401 students in a school. P.T. teacher wants them to
stand in rows and columns such that the number of rows is
equal to the number of columns. Find the number of rows.
Solution:
Let the number of rows be x
So, the number of columns = x
Therefore, number of students = x ×
x = x2
Thus, x2 = 2401 gives x =
= 49
The number of rows = 49.
6
Estimating Square Root
·
Consider the following situations:
1. Deveshi has
a square piece of cloth of area 125 cm2 . She wants to know whether
she can make a handkerchief of side 15 cm. If that is not possible she wants to
know what is the maximum length of the side of a handkerchief that can be made
from this piece.
2. Meena and
Shobha played a game. One told a number and other gave its square root. Meena
started first. She said 25 and Shobha answered quickly as 5. Then Shobha said
81 and Meena answered 9. It went on, till at one point Meena gave the number
250. And Shobha could not answer. Then Meena asked Shobha if she could atleast
tell a number whose square is closer to 250.
In
all such cases we need to estimate the square root.
We
know that 100 < 250 < 400 and = 10 and = 20.
So
10 < < 20
But
still we are not very close to the square number.
We
know that 152 = 225 and 162 = 256
Therefore,
15 < < 16 and 256 is much closer to 250 than
225.
So,
is approximately 16.